Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Space and Culture
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mapping the Remains of the Postindustrial Landscape

John Kirk

University of Leeds

This article examines class and its relevance for contemporary cultural studies in Britain through a reading of a recent publication concerned with the current state of the British working class in the wake of rapid socioeconomic change occurring in the United Kingdom and across the developed world. Although the subject of social class in Britain has always been contentious, the past two decades have witnessed a retreat from class analysis in a whole range of areas for a variety of reasons. With the emergence of postmodernism, some cultural commentators have identified a new, unprecedented proliferation of social and cultural identities clamoring for recognition, reducing the importance of class, if not eclipsing it altogether. By focusing on Charlesworth’s text, this article examines the "neglect" of class on the cultural studies agenda; it also addresses and criticizes some of the theoretical premises for understanding working-class experience developed by Charlesworth, while welcoming the return in his book to the subject of class.

Key Words: working class • culture • postindustrial • body-space • habitus • language

Space and Culture, Vol. 6, No. 2, 178-186 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1206331202250100


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Space and CultureHome page
P. Gilfillan
Fundamental Ontology Versus Esse est percipi: Theorizing (Working Class) Being and Liberation
Space and Culture, May 1, 2009; 12(2): 250 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Space and CultureHome page
S. J. Charlesworth
Reflections on Working-Class Space,Being,and Experience
Space and Culture, August 1, 2004; 7(3): 327 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Space and CultureHome page
J. Kirk
A Reply
Space and Culture, August 1, 2004; 7(3): 343 - 348.
[PDF]