This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jenkins, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Dialectics of Design

Wilfrid Laurier University

The popularity of deconstructivist architecture around the world has invited controversy over the sensationalist design of these buildings. New urbanists, in particular, have criticized decon architecture as alienating and disorienting. From a historical perspective, this opposition between deconstructivists and new urbanists is the latest in a long line of debates over what constitutes "good design." Using a political-economy approach based on the work of Karl Polanyi, this article examines a centuries-long dialectic in design ideology between those who seek to embed design in social mores and those who attempt to "disembed" it from oppressive discourses. This analysis shows that the dialectic of design movements is intimately connected to the development of capitalist markets.

Key Words: deconstructivism • new urbanism • good design • political economy

Space and Culture, Vol. 9, No. 2, 195-209 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1206331205286029


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?